1. American Heart Association: www.americanheart.org 2. American College of Cardiology: www.acc.org 3. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network: www.show.scot.nhs.uk/sign/ 4. Henrikson CA et al. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:979 5.Henning R e tal.N Engl J Med 2003; 349:733 6. Sargent RP et al. BMJ 2004; 328:977 7. Montalescot G et al. JAMA. 2004; 292:362-366. 8. Studio RITA 3. Lancet 2002 ; 360: 764 9. Studio RITA 2. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 ; 42:1161 10. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2004 ; 140:569 11. Studio GRACE. Ann Intern Med 2004 ; 140: 857 12. Babapulle MN et al. Lancet 2004 ; 364: 583-91 13. Studio Atlantic C - PORT. JAMA 2002; 287: 1943 14. Keeley EC. Lancet 2003; 361: 13 15. AHA/ACC. Linee guida sull'IMA. Circulation. 2004;110:588 16. Kereiakes DJ et al. Am Heart J 2002 ; 144:615-24. 17. Pearson TA et al. Circulation 2002; 106:388 18. Simes RJ. Am Heart J 2003;145:47 19. Zijlstra F et al. Eur Heart J 2002 ; 23:550 20. Studio AWESOME. J Am College Cardiol 2002; 39:266 21. Legrand VMG et al. Circulation 2004; 109:1114 22. Studio TIME. JAMA 2003; 289:1117 23. Studio MASS-II. Am Coll Cardiol 2004 ; 43:1743 24. Brophy JM et al. Ann Intern Med 2004 ; 141: 292 25. Brown D et al. Heart 2003;89:535-537 26. Studio WARIS II. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:969 27. Pletcher MJ et al. Arch Intern Med 2004 ; 164:1285. 28. Studio GISSI-Prevenzione. Lancet 1999; 354:447-455 29. Hambrect R et al. Circulation 2004; 109:1371 30. Studio HOPE. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:145 31. Studio EUROPA. Lancet 2003; 362:782 32. Studio PEACE. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:2058-2068 33. Studio CREATE. JAMA 2005; 293:427-435 34. Studio CAMELOT. JAMA. 2004; 292:2217-2225. 35. Van de Werf F et al. for the GRACE Investigators. BMJ 2005 Feb 26; 330:441. 36. Hoffmann MHK et al. Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography . JAMA. 2005 May 25; 293:2471-2478. 37. Keely EC et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolitic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomized trial. Lancet 2003: 361:13-20 38. Grines CL et al. Fibrinolitic Therapy : is it a teratment of the past ? Circulation 2003; 107:2538-2542 39.Silber S et al. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:804-847. 40. Katritis DG et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in non acute coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis. Circulation June 7 2005; 111: 2906-2912. 41. Wiest FC et al. Suboptimal pharmacotherapeutic management of chronic stable angina in the primary care setting. Am J Med 2004; 117: 234-241. 42. Opie LH et al. Controversies in stable coronary artery disease. Lancet 2006 Jan 7; 367:69-78. 43. Hannah EL et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting versus Stent Implantation. N Engl J Med 2005 May 26; 352:2174-2183. 44. Van de Werf F et al. Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial. Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ASSENT-4 PCI) investigators. Lancet 2006 Feb 18; 367:569-578 45. Keeley EC et al. Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials. Lancet 2006 Feb 18; 367:569-578 46. Metha SR et al. Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes .A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. JAMA. 2005 Jun 15; 293:2908-2917. 47. Fox KAA et al. 5-year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Lancet 2005 Sept 10; 366:914-920 48. de Winter RJ et al. for the Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes (ICTUS) Investigators. Early Invasive versus Selectively Invasive Management for Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med 2005 Sept 15; 353:1095-1104 49.. Lagerqvist B et al for The Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC-II) Investigators. 5-year outcomes in the FRISC-II randomised trial of an invasive versus a non-invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a follow-up study. Lancet 2006 Sept 16; 368:998-1004. 50. Stenestrand U et al. Long-term Outcome of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Prehospital and In-Hospital Thrombolysis for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction . JAMA. 2006 Oct 11;296:1749-1756. 51. Bavry AA et al. Benefit of Early Invasive Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes. A Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Clinical Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48:1319-1325 52. Boden WE et al. for the COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007 Apr 12; 356:1503-1516. 53. Hoenig MR et al. Early invasive versus conservative strategies for unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(3):CD004815 54. Antman EM et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. Pubblicato anticipatamente 11 dicembre 2007. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188209. http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188209v1 55. Anderson JL et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.028. Available at: http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/full/50/7/e1. Circulation. 2007; DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185752. Available at: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185752 56. Qayyum R et al. Systematic Review: Comparing Routine and Selective Invasive Strategies for the Acute Coronary Syndrome. Ann Intern Med 2008 Feb 5; 148:186-196 57. Trikalinos A et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis. Lancet 2009 Mar 14; 373:911-918 58. Bravata DM et al. Systematic Review: The Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Ann Intern Med 2007 Nov 20; 147: 703-716. 59. Hlatky MA et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet 2009 Apr 4; 373:1190-1197.
|
|
